Saturday, December 2, 2017

OWNING your sandbox

OWNING your sandbox. As software engineers we all like to work on latest technology and coding new applications. People generally don’t like spending a lot of time maintaining the code. However, in the world of microservices the owners of each microservice are very well known and defined unlike in the world of monolithic applications. That means that you own it in the true sense. You own the code. You own the QA environment. You own the Stage environment. You own the production environment and all the errors that come along with it :) On positive note, you have a lot to be proud of and you can turn it into opportunities :) You own something that is contributing your company’s customers and what you do responsibly affects the lives of many people in a positive way. Almir Mustafic

10,000 foot level view in technology

10,000 foot level view in technology: How useful is it? What can be done at this level? If the 30,000 foot level is the CTO level, then consider the 10,000 foot level as the level that software engineering managers and directors operate at. To achieve the success at 10,000 foot level, you as a software engineering manager need to dive deep into technical details, help the team lay the foundation from BOTH organizational and technical side. It is the little moves that get the team to this level. Once the team’s applications and results at that level, then you as a manager have ability to perform the high level analysis and troubleshooting without necessarily being in code on daily or weekly basis. Therefore, your ability to troubleshoot technical issues at the 10,000 foot level is a testament to the great work of your team. Go TEAM !! Almir Mustafic

AMAZON WORKSPACES

AMAZON WORKSPACES. I am not sure how many of you have heard of Amazon WorkSpaces. Let me give you some information and my analysis after using it for some time. What is it? It is the Amazon’s solution to desktops in the cloud. What’s the point? Well, if you want to use a basic less powerful laptop or even use a Chromebook as your daily computer, then you will not be missing the full functionality of a powerful Windows 10 machine. For example, you can use your Chromebook to connect to your Amazon WorkSpace machine and then you get the full Windows 10 experience. The point is that it gives you the experience as if your remote/workspace Windows 10 machine is really part of your Chromebook. Where it makes the most sense is using Chromebooks to connect to your Amazon WorkSpace machine as Chromebooks with Chrome OS are fast for anything you do in the browser and they are very secure; Chromebooks are also generally cheaper than other laptops. Just a thought as an alternative to buying fully functional laptops/PCs/Macs.  Almir Mustafic

Is the grass greener somewhere else?

Is the grass greener somewhere else? I am talking about our jobs. Do you sell your house if the grass in the backyard is not green anymore?  Here are three quotes to think about: “Don’t assume that the grass is greener somewhere else; you should rather attempt watering your own grass first” — somebody “Work to live instead of living to work” — somebody “Love your job and not your company because your employer may one day say goodbye to you” — one of well respected Indian prime ministers The complicated question would be: How do you follow these three quotes and end up enjoying your life and your job? Books have been written about this. I cannot really provide you the answer, but I can definitely tell you the following after being 20 years in software engineering field professionally: If you do it to only satisfy your boss, you are doing it for a wrong reason and that enthusiasm cannot last long and it will NOT turn into positive experience. If you do it for bigger reasons, it will indirectly end up satisfying your boss and others and you will have fun. If things go bad, you have the bigger reasons to be the foundation for future.  You define for yourself what “bigger reasons” means to you. Almir Mustafic

Do-ers in your company should be taking a big role in the process implementation/improvements or at least have an important seat

Do-ers in your company should be taking a big role in the process implementation/improvements or at least have an important seat. Do-ers are connected with reality and they will tell you what works and what does not. When I say “do-ers”, I am talking about people who know what happens on the floor on daily basis. I am talking about creators, innovators, people who grind through technical problems and still speak the business language. I am not saying that do-ers alone have to drive this, but the right thing to do is to first approach them and ask them what they feel the problems are and what they feel the solutions could be. For you to solve problems, you have to have context and to have the right context, you need to be connected with daily activities on the floor. The success of your solutions is directly proportional to your contextual understanding of the problem that you are trying to solve. What worked in another company or what somebody has written in a book cannot necessarily solve your problems. In conclusion, we all need more doing. That's why I am keeping this post short and to the point as there are tasks to be done :) Almir Mustafic

Doing software development from bottom up when you need to or is this a norm?

Doing software development from bottom up when you need to or is this a norm? If somebody asked you to first build the wheels for the car before having the car at all, what would you do? First, I would question if I need to design/build 4 lug or 5 lug wheels. Then I would need to predict or ask about some details to figure out the proper offset and width for the wheels so they don’t stick outside the fenders. Now how does this car analogy apply to software engineering? First, you need to know and define the API contract. Then you would probably build a stub or mocked version of your API and you would put yourself in the shoes of the client trying to use it in cases that you can predict. Depending on the performance requirements, you may end up adding caching and other improvements. This approach is actually not that uncommon. This is actually how you would approach your team to team and microservice to microservice dependencies regardless of how well you know your consumer; it is important to maintain that discipline at the technical level but as for human communication leverage the closeness you have with other teams. Almir Mustafic

X-Factor in Software Engineering

X-factor: If we could put a number on the X-factor that defines success for you as a successful person in your line of work, then we would have a clear mathematical formula for it. X in X-factor is not as simple and quantitative as X in mathematical equations :) Almir Mustafic

SERVICE NAMES, BOUNDARIES (domain lines) and API DEFINITIONS/STANDARDS

SERVICE NAMES, BOUNDARIES (domain lines) and API DEFINITIONS/STANDARDS are some of many important things to achieve the enterprise-level microservice architecture and microservices. Names mean things. So you first need to properly name your services and that’s the names that you would use when talking to your teammates and clients of your services/APIs. I have a separate article on how you go about defining what a microservice is. That's titled "Micro in Microservices" on my site almirsCorner .com. Essentially, you need define the purpose and boundaries of your service. Then you get into API routes and properly defining them for each service. The goal is to keep the routes RESTful and if you run into the situation when they are not, then it should trigger you to revisit the purpose and boundaries of that given microservice. Maybe that service needs to be split into smaller services.

Thank you for reading this.

Almir Mustafic

Saturday, October 28, 2017

Architecture Diagram for ...

ARCHITECTURE DIAGRAM representing interactions of your family of microservices is one of many important things to achieve the enterprise-level microservice architecture and microservices. After going through the design and contract definitions of your APIs/microservices, your team needs to put together a single diagram that explains the interaction among microservices (owned by your team) and how these microservices interact with other teams’ microservices. This is basically the blueprint for your team’s work and this picture needs to be constantly updated as you are evolving your services. What does this give you? It gives you the big picture view and it allows you to detect good or bad patterns that you cannot see when you are deep in your code. For example, you may be able to see that you are doing too many direct API calls for something that could be done with pub/sub approach.


Almir Mustafic

P-BAR metrics in the life of agility

P-BAR
P = Product value
B = Bug fixing value
A = Architecture value
R = Robustness value

There are many different ways to measure the productivity of your agile teams, but certain measures get typically forgotten but they are ultimately why you are doing the work in the first place.
That's why I thought of this measuring system called P-BAR.

P for Product value and it is purposely the first letter. This is what ultimately matters. This is what your end customers benefit from. In a perfect sprint, you are always adding a lot of product value. However, the real world is not perfect and that's ok. It is ok not to have a lot of product value in sprint 0 and 1. But later you should be having sprints with the P value high.

Bug fixing value makes sense after you some number of P-value sprints and now functionality is being tested, and it is ok to have some percentage of bugs being fixed. However, if you are adding a lot of B-value in the 11th hour of the project, then it means you left all your bug discovery and/or fixing for late in the game.

Architecture value within your sprints may be high at the at the beginning sprints and occasional sprint later, but you should question it if too much of this being added closer to the end of your releases.

Robustness value measures to what degree you are developing your code to the enterprise level. This is something that should be evenly distributed throughout all sprints. It should be part of the culture and not something being done at the end.

In this article I will not get into how you measure this. You will somehow measure each value for each sprint and you can use it to detect if you are heading in the right direction and you can also capture trends/averages for overall release. At some point, I will write a full article about this.

Thank you,

Almir Mustafic

Microservice Architecture, but NOT microservice mindset?

Microservice Architecture, but NOT microservice mindset?
We are on the same team!
Let's say we as a company decide to implement the microservice architecture and we also decide to split the teams into domains for each team to own a domain (group of microservices). You may be a member of team A and I may be a member of team B and we are all on the same ship. There is a water leak in your area of the ship, but my side of the ship looks good.  What do we do? Let's help out each other because we are all members/passengers on the same ship. We are all going to the same destination :) Microservice teams were created to pave domain boundaries at the architectural level, but it does not mean that we should create boundaries among members of different domain team members. Yes, the API contracts are definitions for how our services communicate, but for the sake of final destination, we need to tear down those boundaries when it comes to approaching each other for help and proactive integration. It is beautiful to see ONE team in action especially in crunch time.


Almir Mustafic



Programming languages to teach students in high-school and university

Python-like or C-like as the language to introduce programming to students in high school and university? The question is: Do you introduce programming concepts to high-school/university students using languages that handle memory and other things for you or do you start introducing all of these concepts in languages like C that require you to understand all aspects. I will tell you what worked for me. I was introduced to programming in grade 10 using Basic programming language. There was a version called Better Basic and also Quick Basic. Then in grade 11 we learned procedural programming in a programming language called Turing (not Turing machine but a Pascal-like language developed by University of Toronto for teaching purposes). Then a year later, I started getting interested in C and C++. As you can see, I eased into the languages that introduced me to NULL exceptions and memory leaks :)
With this approach I was not overwhelmed and this set up the foundation for a fun journey in the software engineering field. However, everybody is different. What would work for majority?


Almir Mustafic

Language of Software Engineers and Scrum-master skills (quick thoughts)

Language of software engineers and skills of scrum-masters? All software developers speak the same language and that is pseudo-code :) However, there are still communication issues among software engineers specifically with other teams. That's where the role of great scrum-masters fits in. That great scrum-master does not necessarily need to be technical but he/she needs to have the skills of hearing roadblocks that engineers communicate in their technical language. I said "hearing" and hearing is not the same as listening. Listening is just a pre-requisite for hearing. Once you hear it, now you need to know how to action it and mobilize the right people. Coaching comes along with all of this, but that is a separate topic because it is also a responsibility of the tech manager. These skills separate great scrum-masters from others.
Almir Mustafic
P.S. Disclaimer: On any given day, I wear a hat of a solutions architect, engineer, scrum-master and tech manager.



Bugs in Software (quick thoughts)

Introducing bugs in your software applications? If you are a software engineer and you introduce a bug in your application, it might not be that bad.
Let me explain. The best bug you can introduce by accident is the one that fixes/heals an existing more serious problem and introduces a minor problem :) It is all about incremental improvements :)


Almir Mustafic

NoSQL (some quick thoughts)

NoSQL? If you are developing your applications for real-time interactions using NoSQL, you still need to pay attention to your data structure even though your database does not enforce it. Your model classes in your choice of programming language are your contract because that NoSQL data has to eventually end up into some form of relational database when you decide to report on it.

Almir Mustafic